Hispanicae Advocationis Libri Dvo

Purchase of this book includes free trial access to www.million-books.com where you can read more than a million books for free. This is an OCR edition with typos. Excerpt from book: half of the Dutch against the Spanish a certain decree of his predecessor, a very well-balanced man, and the new judge had, f shame to say, been advocate in that case against the Spaniards, and this decree his predecessor, who had made it, for very just reasons brought forward by us, had never been willing...
More Description

Purchase of this book includes free trial access to www.million-books.com where you can read more than a million books for free. This is an OCR edition with typos. Excerpt from book: half of the Dutch against the Spanish a certain decree of his predecessor, a very well-balanced man, and the new judge had, f shame to say, been advocate in that case against the Spaniards, and this decree his predecessor, who had made it, for very just reasons brought forward by us, had never been willing to hand over for execution. Here in another case he gave the privileges of a fiscus to the fiscus of Barbary, to our detriment; in this case he ridiculed in various ways the rights of the Spanish fiscus to our disadvantage. In this case involving Barbary did he read gthe response of Ruinus which I cited? Did he weigh our oral and written argument against that fiscus of Barbary? At eight o'clock in the evening he was asked by me to examine all the points?at sunrise the next morning he gave a judgment against us. After hearing the representations of six advocates on the other side up to the hour for dinner, right after dinner he gave an interlocutory decree, without examining other statements (I believe this, at any rate), even those of a large number of pleaders, or hthe opinion of Cravetta (this I know for sure) on which our strongest argument 187 was based. He even did this, although the question involved in this interlocutory decree was so long and intricate?namely, whether a third party may be admitted to delay the execution of a judgment against another?that the resolution of it would not be very easy. He ought to have read other writers; he ought to have read Alexander, who has written a volume on l. saepe1', 'this paragraph in the Digest' lacks in system, as even Zasius observes, k and the President of the Neapolitan council says that the article is handed down in a confused way by the doctors. Still why do we gather other points? Is there anybody who has heard him or see...