The Unified Field Theory

THIS IS AN OUTDATED VERSION! The 2nd Edition is now available at www.inspiredphysics.com. The Unified Field Theory, proposed by Jesse Chandler, looks beyond the established paradigms of our day and encourages the reader to view light and matter from an entirely new perspective. It describes how energy circulates within subatomic particles and it outlines the principles that govern particle behavior. It explains why the speed of light in a vacuum appears to be constant and why a change...
More Description

THIS IS AN OUTDATED VERSION! The 2nd Edition is now available at www.inspiredphysics.com. The Unified Field Theory, proposed by Jesse Chandler, looks beyond the established paradigms of our day and encourages the reader to view light and matter from an entirely new perspective. It describes how energy circulates within subatomic particles and it outlines the principles that govern particle behavior. It explains why the speed of light in a vacuum appears to be constant and why a change in the velocity potential of light will be accompanied by a dilation in time. All of the concepts that are revealed in this book point to the same remarkable conclusion... that all forces, whether they are electric, magnetic, or gravitational, are driven by a single type of energy field.The term "Unified Field Theory" was first coined by Albert Einstein during the later portion of his life, while he was attempting to resolve discrepancies between the Theory of Relativity and the world of quantum physics. His goal was to develop a theory that would accurately describe all physical interactions, both at the microscopic level and the macroscopic level. In addition, Einstein hoped to find a solution in which all physical interactions are governed by one energy field. Although other scientists of his day eventually gave up on the unified field concept, Einstein remained focused on his goal until the day he died. Unfortunately he never found the answers he was looking for. Until now, all attempts to develop an acceptable unified field theory have failed, and discrepancies between these two areas of theoretical physics still plague the scientific community. Isn't it possible that these discrepancies exist because our current theories were built on the wrong foundation to begin with? Could it be that some of our original assumptions may not have been correct? We can continue to add complexity to these theories in an effort to account for the discrepancies that we find, or we can open our eyes to the possibility that there is a much simpler answer.